Thank you, Madam Chair. In ’15-16 the total payment that was due to the contractor, based on the revised cash flow that we

were able to negotiate, was based on a cost of $8.9 million Canadian, but when that payment was required, that obviously had devaluation in the Canadian dollar compared to the American dollar, which is what’s driving the need for this supplementary appropriation because of that item to actually come here. The amount of exchange rate required us to make the payment to increase the amount that was due to the supplier. Going forward, as Mr. Aumond said, we will have a facility in place with our bank to try to hedge the ’16-17 and ’17-18 payments due to the supplier. Thank you.