We’re not paying it because we don’t have the proper documentation indicating that there was a contract between Rowe’s Construction and we’re not paying it because the money that we got was not for this. The money that we got from the New Brunswick government was to pay for the deficiencies of the bridge, not to cover unfinished business by ATCON that wasn’t paid out. We don’t have any written authorization from ATCON. We don’t have any documentation. There is really nothing there other than the discussions that Mr. Rowe has been having with DOT, and based on that we are continuing to work on solutions. Thank you.
Tom Beaulieu on Question 935-17(5): Deh Cho Bridge Referee Claim Review
In the Legislative Assembly on October 6th, 2015. See this statement in context.
Question 935-17(5): Deh Cho Bridge Referee Claim Review
Oral Questions
October 5th, 2015
See context to find out what was said next.