So, again, things are coming down to some more clarity. That's an August 31st deadline that Members were made aware. Prior to that I can assure Members here and those listening in, Regular Members of the committee here weren't fully aware of the severity and the gravity happening behind the scenes. Of course, we all understood there were low water issues. I mean, we're quite observant in that regard, but Members were somewhat handicapped, as I said, in terms of having this type of information. Now that we have this information and now that we're discussing this here today, I guess my question is, as a Member of this committee, how did we deal with low water issues for the last year since the last time we put a $20 million subsidy back in the hands of NTPC? In the last 12 months, what has NTPC done in order to control its demand management of diesel and what were those savings and how was that quantified? Thank you.
Daryl Dolynny on Committee Motion 141-17(5): Concurrence Of Tabled Document 325-17(5): Supplementary Estimates (infrastructure Expenditures), No. 3, 2015-2016, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on October 5th, 2015. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 141-17(5): Concurrence Of Tabled Document 325-17(5): Supplementary Estimates (infrastructure Expenditures), No. 3, 2015-2016, Carried
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
October 5th, 2015
Page 6697
See context to find out what was said next.