Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman. I recognize that that is the role of the appeal officers to look at potential procedural errors. What I'm asking is, is there anything aside from procedural errors that makes the appeal process almost redundant? If you're only looking at procedural errors and you're not looking at anything outside of that, this appeal process is -- you know, as the Minister indicated we may be the only jurisdiction to have that type of process because it's probably not effective because it looks at just procedures. What I want to know is are there any potential or future plans to look at an individual that applies for a job that appears to be a priority one candidate that appears to have all of the qualifications that are laid out in the job ad, and then the individual puts their name in and they lose the job, so they appeal it and they said procedurally everything was fine. But they're not looking at the fact that maybe he was the most qualified person for the job but yet was not considered. That's what I'm asking is there anything outside of just this procedural appeal that could give people an opportunity that should have been getting jobs to get those jobs. Thank you.
Tom Beaulieu on Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
In the Legislative Assembly on June 3rd, 2016. See this statement in context.
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
June 2nd, 2016
See context to find out what was said next.