Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to thank the Minister for her answer. I worked in the field for 23 years. I understand the importance of the crossover. We did a lot of crossover, so I understand that and I understand the importance of it. I still struggle with why you're changing job descriptions from a youth officer and a sport and recreation one and making it combined to one.
I guess my next question is: Why is the government looking at it? Is this going to be a potential cut? Because now we're going to have two people in the region doing the same, similar, job, same job description, is this something that they're looking at for future cuts? I understand the importance of crossovers, but having two jobs with different job descriptions allows that to happen still. So is this a potential future cut, or is this a better decision for them to do? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.