Thank you. No, the evaluation framework is intended to help us identify whether or not we are making progress in poverty. It is not just the $500,000, absolutely not. We are doing things through income support, through housing. There are five main pillars that we are trying to address under poverty, so it is not just this fund.
You know, we have some criteria that we ask for to ensure that the groups that are getting the money are spending the money, but I take your point. We put this out, and there is growing interest, and we will continue to release the dollars. The $500,000 was always intended to help people leverage more money, and in many cases it has helped individuals leverage more money.
I have had some individuals; Ms. Green is an example, say we have to look differently at how we are allocating these monies. Maybe we should block-fund some of the pillars or guarantee certain parts as larger sums and smaller sums. I have committed to looking at that; probably not for this go-around, because we have already issued the call with the parameters.
I am going to ask the advisory committee to provide me with some insight on how to distribute these monies in the future before we do a future call, based on the types of things that Ms. Green has mentioned to me in the past. It is a great fund, and it is certainly well-subscribed, as are many of the programs available through the GNWT. Thank you, Mr. Chair.