Thanks, Mr. Chair. That was a very detailed answer and I appreciate the deputy minister's comments. I guess, as I see it, there are two options for making sure this is a legally binding land use plan, and that is what our mandate calls for. One is to bring us under the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act, and Mr. Hagen mentioned the Gwich'in and the Sahtu Land Use Plans. This would be, I think, an ideal -- that is the accepted and negotiated process in those two areas. Of course the Tlicho Government would have to have some say in this, but it would seem to make some sense to bring this under the MVRMA so that it is legally binding, you have got an agreed-upon process for developing plans, amending them, and all of that sort of thing.

The other option might be the Planning Act, which is a bit antiquated. It is on our side. So I guess I am asking the department to give some thought to what is going to be the legal bases for this land use plan? My recommendation is that you bring it in under the MVRMA, but of course subject to negotiation with the Tlicho Government. Is that on the radar for the department, or what legislation are they thinking about to making sure that this is a legally binding land use plan? Thanks Mr. Chair.