Thanks, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the answer from the deputy minister. I don't need to lecture him on this, but there are lots of great models out there. The Norwegian pension fund is over $1 trillion now, and there are difficulties with the Alberta one; it's capped. In Alaska, they just give it away, which I don't think is an appropriate model. The governance issue is more than just having people watch over it. How the money is invested, I agree, we want to be fairly conservative because we do not want to lose the principle, but, at the same time, some funds have been placed in environmental social screens in terms of what they invest the money in and so on.

I think, by having some element of public governance, it will also elevate the profile of this fund and help us in terms of promotion of it and so on. My main concern is that right now we do not have a legislated revenue into it. It's by Cabinet policy, which is discretionary. I don't think there is any intention to change it, as far as I can detect, but that should be legislated, to take that option away or make it much more difficult, require public debate and discussion around that in the future.

In any event, I don't know if the deputy minister or the Minister has any further thinking on that, but I am happy to hear it. Then I have one other question, if I may, Mr. Chair. Thank you.