Thank you, Mr. Chair. The project is still within the budget and the funds that we have identified. The fact that the tenders came in well in excess of what was expected frankly forced us to go back and look at other options. I am a little constrained in getting into too much detail about some of the security features of the facility in a public setting.

However, perhaps generally what I can say is one of the difficulties with the first design is it would have involved much more extensive need for a concrete footing and placement. When we were frankly disappointed with the results of the previous tender, we asked our experts to reconsider other options. We had some structural engineers come in and look at options that could get the same result without requiring some of the more expensive components of the original plan and original design. I am happy to report that an option was identified with the benefit of that expert review with the engineers.

The other nice benefit is the new plan, because it has changed somewhat, does not run into the same issues around a construction window, with the absence of some of the footings that were there previously, so we do anticipate this tender going out as early as Monday or Tuesday and are hoping that we will get a favourable response. That would still allow construction to happen within this year and be completed over the late fall and early winter. Thank you.