Thank you. No, I appreciate that. It seems a little strange to me that, in addition to bargaining on behalf of the teachers, the Teachers' Association bargains on behalf of itself, and got a position out of it, and the fact that pay is linked to educational attainment has nothing to do with the fact that this is the union. It should be the employer who provides that. It's a little strange for me that there's this control by the union of this administrative function that really should be within government, it seems to me. The UNW isn't doing this kind of stuff, to my knowledge, so it's a little strange. I'll move onto something else because I don't have much time here, so I don't want to spend forever on this.

Under education, operations and development, I see here that the South Slave -- well, I guess it just says South Slave here. It shows that there is no net loss of positions in the South Slave. In the business plans, I was told there is no net loss of positions, and in the main estimates, there is no net loss of positions yet. I'm well aware that, in Hay River, there's a position that is being moved to Yellowknife. It doesn't show up in the business plans. It doesn't show up in the main estimates. The department never came out and told me this. I know this because Hay River is a small town. Can I get some explanation on why this information is hidden? Thanks, Mr. Chair.