Thank you, Mr. Chair. I tend to agree with the Member. I have seen cases where they have given it to the lowest bid, and the first thing they do is come back for a change order to try to get them back up to the second-lowest bid. You are absolutely right. You get what you pay for. Sometimes, politically, it is always easiest to go with the low bid. We use an RFP process, and in some cases, I have seen RPF processes that have worked where you could look at other factors besides the price, then you can make a determination based on the information provided. I think you get a better-quality product going that route.

There are still going to be cases where tenders are going to be let, and there are going to be prices coming in. As we deal with it more and more, I think you are going to see less and less of the absolute lowest price not necessarily hitting the work and having to come in and clean up after them afterwards. I think we have taken some steps to ensure that doesn't happen. I know, in some of the portfolios I have held, we have had some cases of that. We have tried to take steps to ensure that those don't happen too often. Thank you, Mr. Chair.