Okay. So, again, I'm trying to find a way to ask this question, but fundamentally the committee found a way that was in order, that was acceptable to the legislation. We vetted that with our legal counsel. So this is not out of line with the act; it's out of line with the policy intent of the government, but the committee found this problem. We're not making this up; it's happened. So this is a very fundamentally live issue. If not the committee's amendments, the committee's policy direction that this be resolved, what is the approach of government to this?

I don't want to hear about why it couldn't be changed in this part. How are we going to support our community governments who have had this happen to them? How are we going to effectively manage conflicts between mineral tenure and community public infrastructure or community assets like quarries? How are we going to manage that, how is this government going to respond to that problem, and how are we going to solve it? Thank you, Mr. Chair.