Thank you, Madam Chair. This year, when the park season was extended by, I think, only a couple of weeks, the cost of doing so was $226,000. It does certainly come with a cost. While this year was a great opportunity to try that out and to see what the impacts were, particularly in a time when there were so many local residents not able to travel, it still needs to be balanced against what the costs are and against what the actual usage is.

For this year, what I have asked is that we try to see whether or not we can do some sort of modified planning around the winter season, to provide that sort of opportunity, particularly now where people aren't able to travel. At the same time, as soon as that happens, the concern we get from the other side is that we're interrupting one of the areas where we have some of our small and medium-sized businesses in the tourism industry who provide access to these kinds of experiences themselves. There is a bit of a balancing act to be found here, and I think the best I can say is that we'll see how this winter goes and see whether or not there are some opportunities to create those options for local residents without impeding access to opportunities for the small and medium-sized businesses that operate in that sector, as well. Thank you, Madam Chair.