Thank you, Madam Chair. I think the short answer is "not necessarily." When we say implement it within the constitutional framework of Canada, I don't think that we're saying anything different than the Government of Canada has said, and we have to recognize that the constitutional framework is the supreme law, and whatever we do has to fit within it. This is why it's important to have discussions with Indigenous governments, to come to as much of a common understanding as possible of what do we mean when we say we're going to fully implement UNDRIP in Canada. It's important to come to that understanding.

There might be circumstances where consent will be required, just as there is now in our constitutional framework, but it might not be every circumstance where our constitutional framework provides that Aboriginal rights can be balanced against other interests as well. Very much looking forward to continuing that conversation and getting as much clarity and common understanding as we can.

I should also point out, though, that the French version of UNDRIP says, "We'll aim to achieve the free, prior, and informed consent," which is language that the federal government has also adopted. There is much to talk about, though, to get as much common understanding as we can. Thank you, Madam Chair.