Thanks, Madam Chair. Yes, I want to follow up on my colleague's questions about the independent review of competitiveness of the NWT mining regime. As far as I know, ITI has hired a contractor for $300,000, and this was work that was started in the last Assembly, to do a report that basically repeats methodology from a previous report, and maybe adds a few bells and whistles. I think that was supposed to be done by March 31st, and that's great. That might provide some fodder for this independent review. What is the role of the public going to be in this review, or is this going to be a consultant doing a report giving advice to ITI?
Look, ITI has an inherent conflict of interest in doing this work. They are a department that is responsible for promoting mining, and I've always given them credit. They do a great job at that. You can't have that department in charge of regulating it and looking at benefits at the same time. It's just an inherent conflict of interest. They are advocating for industry, and that's part of their job. What is the role of the public going to be in this independent review? Thanks, Madam Chair.