Thanks, Madam Chair. I'm fine having this $300,000 spent to redo the study, but there are lots of other international examples that we can and should be looking at in terms of benefit retention. Norway has a pension fund that is now over a trillion dollars because of the way they manage their North Sea oil and gas; North Sea oil, in particular. They also had state ownership of part of it through Statoil, so there are lots of examples that we can and should be learning from around the world, not just repeating some of the mistakes that have been made in Canada around resource development. It needs to be a well-rounded review that does engage and involve the public, and looking at international best practices, as well.

I want to go one other item if I can in here, Madam Chair, and it's the socio-economic forum that's mentioned in the middle item. I do think that that's a good idea, but I would hope that the participation be extended beyond just the mining industry and Indigenous governments and GNWT. I think there are others that have an interest and, perhaps, stake in this. There are people in academia who have looked at this before. Maybe some NGOs might have some thoughts or ideas. Are we going to try to find a way to make this a little more inclusive than the way it's portrayed here? Thanks, Madam Chair.