I'm going to look at Hansard so even I can remember what I just said.

So I guess my question is around -- and I get that this might be department by department, but around the derivative of this number.

So to me, there are already projects and certain assets that we have that are already being handled by different accounting areas of our budget. So this is just all the incidental extras that were not maybe accounted for. So, for example, contaminated sites were brought up. Well, a lot of those would be accounted for under federal funding, under other pots, Infrastructure, ENR is dealing with them in different ways.

So is it fair to say that this $70 million is all those additional small items that the government has not, in the past, accounted for, that they're perhaps, with respect to my colleagues' questions, they may have already been in the budget areas that we're accounting for the liabilities with our other assets, in the past. Thank you.