Thank you, Madam Chair. And I apologize to the Minister, but I am going to ask a little bit further along this but just because I think I have an understanding, but I want to make sure I do. And if we can't answer it here, I'd welcome the briefing and maybe it'll direct some of that, how that briefing going.

So in the past, we've seen amortization of of assets that have been accounted for. And now from what I can gather, you're saying is this amount is the extra amount, like technically sort of the amortization if we knew that we were going to have to pay for the removal of asbestos, etcetera when we first set the amounts.

So to me, I'm curious if this is right, that this is the adjustment for what we now see in the scientific world as liabilities that we didn't know 20 years ago were going to be liabilities so that, you know, municipalities and governments cannot get behind so far that they don't have the money there, or they're not already preparing.

So this to me, seems to just be a proactive accounting number in order to say, governments, you need to start thinking about these extra liabilities that are already being somewhat accounted for in amortization but not fully. Thank you.