Thanks, Madam Chair. So this project's actually in my riding, and it's something -- so I've been here six years and I've never really understood how we owned the old hospital and then it was given to somebody else to renovate and then we leased the whole thing back at a cost, and then we get it back at the end of the period when it's been rented to us for 30 years. I've just never really understood that arrangement. It just boggles my mind. And I don't understand why the government didn't keep the building, renovate it, and then we used it for long-term care and extended care, which is I guess the proposed use. I just never understood this. And I'm not sure I would -- if it was up to me, it wouldn't happen again. I'll just leave it that way. Thanks, Madam Chair.
Kevin O'Reilly on Committee Motion 184-19(2): Committee Report 23-19(2): Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on Review of the 2018-19 and 2019-20 Public Accounts - Public-Private Partnership (P3) Classification for Old Stanton Refurbishment Project, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on December 8th, 2021. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 184-19(2): Committee Report 23-19(2): Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on Review of the 2018-19 and 2019-20 Public Accounts - Public-Private Partnership (P3) Classification for Old Stanton Refurbishment Project, Carried
Consideration Of Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
December 8th, 2021
Page 3349
See context to find out what was said next.