Thank you, Madam Chair. I would ask that, you know, even if the government disagrees with this motion, they could try to explain what was going on. The auditor general told us that the Old Stanton was a P3, and the GNWT accountants disagreed. We had a battle of the experts going on in committee. And I don't know public accounting standards well enough, or the new P3 standards well enough, but to me when the Auditor General of Canada tells you something is away, according to the public accounts, you listen to them. So I would like to hear a bit more of a detailed response to this motion. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Rylund Johnson on Committee Motion 184-19(2): Committee Report 23-19(2): Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on Review of the 2018-19 and 2019-20 Public Accounts - Public-Private Partnership (P3) Classification for Old Stanton Refurbishment Project, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on December 8th, 2021. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 184-19(2): Committee Report 23-19(2): Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on Review of the 2018-19 and 2019-20 Public Accounts - Public-Private Partnership (P3) Classification for Old Stanton Refurbishment Project, Carried
Consideration Of Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
December 8th, 2021
Page 3348
See context to find out what was said next.