Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yes. The Minister has touched on one of the criteria that we will obviously be using to evaluate, is whether or not they can be moved in a reasonable manner in a location, not to a new location itself, but within the current proximity to where it is. Again, that is always going to be premised with the need to go out to consultation in advance of that, so even the idea that it could be moved still may not be enough to meet the criteria that we will be establishing. The other piece to this is that, through our notice process, we will be giving individuals the opportunity to deconstruct or remove, whatever it may be, and so fundamentally, we will be following the legal process and if they choose to remove that, then that makes it less of a burden on the taxpayers, obviously.
Ultimately, if they choose not to and they fight this and we go through the legal process, we will take over control and ownership of the assets and we will need to remove them. We may take a variety of different avenues at that point in time, which could include things like having an auction to remove some of these and/or ultimately going after the individual for costs associated with the removal. There are a couple of different legal steps that could be deployed, but again, each one will be case specific. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
