Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair. I will leave this for another time, but it's my view that being the anchor tenant in a bunch of southern REITs' buildings makes absolutely no sense. It does not align with supporting northern businesses, and if we are actually paying above what it would cost for us, we are spending extra money instead of owning the infrastructure. Either we should build it as a government or find actual northern landlords to give that money to, would be my preference. I will leave that as a comment, and I thank the department for their comments on that.

In the area of asset management, my understanding is that the Auditor General is working to create new public accounting standards and that, as part of this work, we will have to carry a liability on our books of what it would cost to essentially not just remediate our assets but to put them in landfills. I believe that work is coming on next year, when the public accounting standards are going to require us to carry a number in our books of what every single building costs to put into a landfill properly, which is a very, very large number, especially the cost in smaller remote communities. I believe we already carry a bit of a liability in regard to asbestos and hazardous materials but not a liability in regard to actually putting those buildings in landfills and the costs. I recognize that policy has not come into place yet, but I am wondering if asset management is involved in that work or if we have in the environment department here any sort of estimate of what that cost is or how they are involved with that. Thank you, Madam Chair.