Yeah, thank you, Madam Chair. I'm going to repeat myself a couple times but, you know, what kind of happens when we do capital estimates is we have a confidential briefing note that gives you a bit of an update, and then we ask question like such as can someone give us an update of what's going on here. And I get there's a debate about the total amount and procurement; I have made that clear. But could the Department of Infrastructure perhaps look at making some sort of public kind of updating that goes with each capital plan. I just find it frustrating that I have to ask what's going on with Fort Simpson LNG when I didn't hear anything there that had to be confidential. It seems fine to publish where we are at with each project as we ask for more money, even if we're not going to say how much money were asking for. But at least some facts to be included with the capital plan, would that be something the department would be willing to look into? Thank you.
Rylund Johnson on Committee Motion 312-19(2): Bill 48: Arbitration Act - Deletion of Clause 77, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on October 25th, 2022. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 312-19(2): Bill 48: Arbitration Act - Deletion of Clause 77, Carried
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
October 25th, 2022
Page 4815
See context to find out what was said next.