Thanks, Mr. Chair. Yeah, I appreciate, you know, the Government House Leader raising this Point of Order and the words from the Member as well, and I support -- I do not believe that there's -- the first item is a Point of Order that Rule 3.2(3)(m) has been breached in any way. That rule reads, you know, that a Member should not introduce any matter in debate that offends practices and precedents of the Assembly.

I believe that the words of the Member were that the departmental official said something. I don't believe that that offends anybody in this House but I don't believe that there's any grounds for a Point of Order. We have to have the ability, as Members, to raise issues on what we hear from government officials in the course of our debates and discussions here, and I don't believe that it was done -- and there were no allegations made against this individual. The individual wasn't even named. So I don't believe that there is anything here in terms of a Point of Order on the first item.

And I'm not going to speak to the second one.

And given that the Member has withdrawn her remarks on the third one, I believe that was the right course of action, and I look forward to your ruling, Mr. Chair. Thank you.