Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yeah, I'll try another time to get a numerical value there.

I guess my other question is I expressed earlier some concern about what LHOs do verse -- well, the Housing Corporation, and I think I would express those same concerns with what district -- sorry, what -- I don't know what to call it -- offices do verse LHOs. I get at some point, we want to have people in the community who are making decisions about housing and we want to have jobs in communities. But, you know, in Yellowknife, for example, we have a North Slave office, and we have a headquarters office, and then we have the Yellowknife Housing Authority office. And I really don't think we need all three. In fact, I think we probably just need one where you could go and talk about housing instead of three spots. And they all come with duplicative costs. I see there's multiple line items for their leases for their offices here. And I've had people go to the housing authority and say hey, can I have access to this program and they say, no, no. You go to -- you go to the North Slave office. And then they go to the North Slave office and they say no, no, you go to headquarters for that. So I -- I guess as part of this review, the Housing Corporation, my understanding does not need to organize itself like a department at all. It doesn't need to follow north and south and Slave and all of the ways that departments organize, and it doesn't need LHOs if it doesn't want to have them. Can look into whether there's some efficiencies on having both, you know, a district office and an LHO doing relatively similar things; is that something on the agenda? Thank you, Mr. Chair.