Yes, thanks, Madam Chair. I know even in the last Assembly, the last official languages commissioner, there was some confusion over who the recommendations should actually go to and who is responsible for acting on them. And in some previous language commissioner's reports there was some criticism leveled at the Legislative Assembly itself for not acting on recommendations from previous reports. And I think there was some misunderstanding between the executive and legislative branches of government. You know, if recommendations from the official languages commissioner would come to the Standing Committee on Government Operations but the government OPs committee doesn't write legislation, can't make changes to the legislation itself unless someone wants to bring forward a private Member's bill, and maybe that's something committee might want to think about at some point. But anyways, there was some confusion over who actually is responsible for responding to recommendations and actually following up on this. And I do believe that those are the responsibility of the executive branch. So that's what I think this recommendation is aimed at, and I'm sure we can clarify that in the legislation moving forward as well. Thanks, Madam Chair.
Kevin O'Reilly on Committee Motion 239-19(2): Committee Report 29-19(2): Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on the Review of the Languages Commissioner for the Northwest Territories Annual Report 2020-2021 - Clarification of Languages Commissioner's Role, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on May 31st, 2022. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 239-19(2): Committee Report 29-19(2): Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on the Review of the Languages Commissioner for the Northwest Territories Annual Report 2020-2021 - Clarification of Languages Commissioner's Role, Carried
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
May 31st, 2022
Page 4397
See context to find out what was said next.