Thank you, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, I'll be very brief. The Member from Frame Lake actually made my point which is that this -- the matter of finding a solution to incentivize alternative energy within the power corporation has been acknowledged as a challenge and a problem and one that is -- a solution is going to be sought for. So did want to emphasize that, again, the finding of the issues, defining the problems, I certainly share that view of it. Bill 60 isn't connected to the -- it's not directly connected and certainly can't solve this problem. Bill 60 is just, again, raising the tax rates so that we can keep our system and keep the revenues from it. And, quite frankly, Madam Chair, it may well be that some of those revenues get directed to efforts on -- in the energy strategy to provide those kinds of alternatives. That's one of the reasons, again, we want to maintain those revenues here and to maintain the higher revenues through the large emitter system. But just I wanted to make sure that folks were aware that Bill 60 doesn't impact directly on the work that's happening already to solve that problem. That work does need to happen.

And just so there's no confusion, electricity generation, that is still exempt. So to the extent that communities are relying on diesel to generate electricity, that diesel is still exempt, just so, again, so the public is aware. Thank you, Madam Chair.