Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, not everyone might be watching would have seen although they would have heard the vote. I do want to note and make the point that Cabinet although didn't speak initially to the motion did make a choice together that we would stand and support having this motion brought to the floor. We wanted to have this opportunity for everyone, including Members on this side of the House, with me, as an opportunity to speak to voice the recognition of what is happening in Norman Wells.
Mr. Speaker, everyone is voicing support for Norman Wells. I hope there's absolutely no doubt that everyone supports Norman Wells and has concern for the situation. I want to lay out a bit of the work that is happening already within government and some of the steps that I think are coming on the horizon of what will be happening next.
And, Mr. Speaker, this is not only a crisis in Norman Wells. Norman Wells, of course, is the hub community. They service the region of the Sahtu. When they are affected, the entire Sahtu community is affected. And I made that point to Imperial Oil when I spoke to them this morning, to just lay out that context, that this is going to affect the entire Sahtu. The more that one region is impacted, others are as well. Just as we saw last year with the evacuation of wildfires. This territory is deeply interconnected, and something that's affecting one small community affects us all.
Mr. Speaker, this is not as easy as just saying write a cheque. A cheque to whom and a cheque to what amount? Mr. Speaker, we want to find a solution that supports residents so that they can stay in their homes, stay in their homes comfortably, heat their homes through the winter, and do so in a way that is sustainable until we get the winter roads in for the resupply. But this is a crisis. It's a crisis that's affecting the whole of the Northwest Territories. It is having a huge financial impact on the Northwest Territories. Low water is affecting us in terms of the barge season. It's affected us in terms of there being a $14 million loss in terms of the revenue we would normally get. But it also affects us in terms of the ferries that have struggled this summer, in terms of roads that are struggling. In every single corner of this territory, there is a need to repair permafrost slumpage up to Tuktoyaktuk, challenges on the Dempster. It impacts the delivery of programs and services and contracts. We are in a dire situation right now in the Northwest Territories, Mr. Speaker, and we are feeling it financially.
NTPC is feeling it deeply right now in terms of what's happening with low water and the costs that are being incurred by the government just to try to keep power rates at the rate that they're at which is the highest rate of anywhere in Canada. We're subsidizing folks down to being at a Yellowknife rate. And I know this isn't necessarily about power rates but, Mr. Speaker, if Imperial Oil pulls out of Norman Wells, I'll tell you it's going to be about power rates real past because NTPC's going to be asked to supply. So there's all sorts of crises, and there's so many of them that are interconnected, and the players are interconnected. We can't just look at it as one thing as government. It is our responsibility to look at the whole of the territory, the whole of the crisis, how did we get here, how will we get out, and what's going to happen next. So I wish I could just simply stand and say don't worry, we're going to solve it tomorrow. But there is a real situation happening right now that we have to look at holistically as a government to make sure that we get this right, and we get it right into the long term.
So, Mr. Speaker, I do want to lay out a little of what we've done right now to date. It started lasting year. It started almost a year ago when we first saw that because of the barge situation in 2023 we were going to have to airlift, and it was the Government of the Northwest Territories that scrambled, that coordinated, and that found a way to make sure that the fuel got into Norman Wells and to the Sahtu region after that barge season so that nobody ran out of fuel before we got the winter roads in. We then were able to accelerate the winter roads and beef them up and make it so that we could plan for more trucks, more deliveries, we got the fuel deliveries into all of the fuel services division serviced communities. Fort Good Hope had to have an airlift because they were at the front lines of a wildfire yet again this year. That cost is being borne through the disaster assistance fund, no change. So the other Sahtu communities are seeing no change to their fuel rates since the June update after the winter road season. All of their fuel rates are expected to remain stable until they get the winter roads in this year.
We're already planning for the winter roads. And all of this costs money, Mr. Speaker, and it's costing extra money right now because everything's -- everything's been challenging and to bring those roads up to the level that they're at to be able to have more trucks on them, heavier trucks on them, more loads go in, it took a lot more work.
Mr. Speaker, we remained in contact, the Government of the Northwest Territories and Department of Infrastructure specifically, remained in contact with Imperial since last year. We had a lot of good meetings with them when we were still coordinating the airlifts last Christmas. Those contacts were very helpful. We've maintained them, and we stayed in touch all the way through our resupply last year up to the time when the barges were cancelled and leading to the moment when the barges were, in fact, cancelled right to the very end as we were getting information from the coast guard, from our senior captains, we were not delaying in getting that information in to any of the other partners. So folks in the Sahtu region, again, a lot of them had already planned through the winter road season, the different stores and suppliers had planned to try to get as much up as they could. And we tried to in every way possible to provide that assistance.
And then, Mr. Speaker, that brings me a little closer to now. So we certainly have known as of this summer that there was likely going to be a resupply by air going in this -- going in sometime this fall. Quite frankly, I would have expected it would be much later in the fall. I'm saddened that it is this early because that extends the period of time that we're going to be dealing with the cost of fuel coming in by flight and not having been able to wait until the winter roads. So ITI's met a number of times in the community, talked to a number of the suppliers, tried to identify a way where we could provide a relief package that would keep the costs down in the community, keep the costs of supplies down in the community, and that's where the $1.8 million program came in so that we could offer that to folks, to the business community, and they can then pass that on by keeping their costs down rather than passing all of their costs on to residents. We've also now are in a position to say that the rates for the senior home heating subsidy are going to be going up monthly so that ensures that all seniors who qualify for senior home heating subsidies will continue to see fully 80 percent of their costs covered. And in addition, Mr. Speaker, the income assistance programs are going to ensure that they will be paying actual heating costs and making sure that their measurements are attaching to the local market basket measure which is going to need to be adjusted when these costs go up. So those things are happening for the residents in the community as well.
This summer, Mr. Speaker, we airlifted 90 loads into Tulita to continue the work on the Tulita health care centre. Not only do we need that project, but we need the jobs to keep everyone employed and keep community employment up in the region. All of this comes with costs.
And so, Mr. Speaker, we're talking about how easy all this is, and it should be simple, but, Mr. Speaker, I want to speak a little bit about responsibility.
It is not about blame. There are residents who need to heat their homes as we're heading into winter. It's not about blame. But, Mr. Speaker, there is some responsibility here, and we certainly have, as a government, done everything to make sure that we were supplying the communities that we're responsible for, communicating with the contractors for the communities where we're not. We want to ensure, and we have to ensure, that we use public dollars responsibly. As I've said, our fiscal situation is dire. Climate change challenges, emergencies, crises, continue to befall us every year, every summer, in multiple communities at a time, and we have to have the capacity to respond. So when we do respond, we need to ask ourselves, who am I going to get that cheque to? Is it going to be on an income threshold? Will it be different if someone has used energy efficiency? Will it be different if someone has mitigated their costs? Do I provide cheques to companies that are going to continue to earn a profit on the sale of fuels? Or do I find some other pathway forward by which we can ensure that people are heating their homes?
Mr. Speaker, I certainly don't want to be seen to be blaming Imperial Oil overtly. I do want to question responsibility. I do think we've asked some good questions here today. We did have a good call with them today. We put it to them that this is a time to step up. As someone who's been in that community for 40 years drawing oil out, and now we need that oil to go back in. And, Mr. Speaker, they did take this away, and I'm expecting -- we've asked to meet with them again. I expect we'll be meeting with them again in the next few days when they've had a chance to go and see what opportunities they might have.
Similarly, Mr. Speaker, the federal government is actually a government -- the only government, not this government -- that's made any profit or any royalty off the Norman Wells oil field over the last 40 years. And, again, to their credit, they marshalled last week Members from multiple departments to meet with myself and Minister Cleveland and MLA from the Sahtu. We sat with them for a long time, talked through the challenge, talked through the problems, put to them the estimate here of $6.8 million, but really putting to them the idea that they need to help us find a path forward to support the residents who are going to be affected. Again, we've seen some follow up from them already just as of today, but I'm expecting that more is to come in the days coming.
So, Mr. Speaker, with all of that said, I'm left, again -- I want to emphasize for the residents that there is a lot happening. There is a lot of plates that are in the air. We are keeping them spinning. It is urgent. That's -- we all stood today to respect and the fact of its urgency. The asks are in. But I am looking to some sense of responsibility certainly with the federal government in particular. We are in a dire state, and the idea of moving a project and cancelling a project, Mr. Speaker, this budget was -- is very difficult to say where we cut a project, which project do we cut, which program do we turn back on. We are in dire need up here. Every project is urgent. Every project is on a risk base scenario. There's not an easy one to move or to cut, and so I am looking to colleagues in the federal government and to partners in Imperial Oil, and I want to assure them that -- the members of the Sahtu -- residents of the Sahtu, we're going to keep looking to them, keep working with them until we find a path forward. Thank you.