Thank you. Yeah, I guess to get into some more specific questions, I would encourage the Minister -- I mean, I prefer making information public as much as possible. It helps the public do their own scrutiny. Even if they don't read it, the information's out there. And I think that substantiations are important for helping them understand why Members may make the decisions the way they make, why Members may not oppose projects, but it's a little bit hard to say when all you have is the name of the project and nothing more to go on. So I would always encourage transparency where possible and when there isn't really a good reason not to be transparent. And I can just say for the substantiations that I've been able to see for all of these projects, there's nothing in there that need to be confidential. It's all this is why the government's spending this money. And I dare even say the substantiations are quite good.

So to get into a specific question, on the NWT courts modernization part, I note -- well, actually -- sorry, Mr. Chair. This is exactly what I -- this is the problem I'm talking about. I was about to start asking questions about the substantiation and I'm now just realizing, of course, that substantiation is confidential. So I got to find a way to ask the question what the substantiation is. So can I get a description of the substantiation of the NWT courts modernization, please, before I ask questions about it. Thanks.