Okay, so that would amount to $10 million of GNWT funding just for planning, which I would consider a very significant amount of money for something we're not even sure is a good idea.

In terms of this project's priority ranking, I know that all the projects go through the planning process. We see at the back of our books that it has to be evaluated according to impact, severity of impact, and urgency in mitigation. Can the Minister share with us how this project was rated in terms of the urgency of the project, the severity of the impact, and also mitigation, so what other options could there be instead of this project; how were those rated in terms of priority? Thank you, Mr. Chair.