Given the reality of the budget reductions we’re facing and all of those types of things, when I look at Education, Culture and Employment, I wonder why the government is moving forward with renovations on Lahm Ridge Tower. That building had over $900,000 worth of renovations done to it since 2002–2003. Given that we are facing these budget reductions, I’m not quite sure why we have to do another renovation to a building that appears to have been renovated on a fairly regular basis. I’ve been into a lot of the different buildings, a lot of different times, and I was always struck by how nice Lahm Ridge Tower looked inside and how well put-together it was.
My question is: why are we renovating a building that seems to be renovated on a fairly regular basis?