Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So my understanding is that the subsidy may not be realized at the pumps because we are afraid others will enjoy that subsidy when they really do not need it.
If we look at the price of fuel, especially in the small communities where the income level is hovering around $30,000, a lot of people fall through the cracks when it comes to subsidies and other government programs.
When fuel prices hike up dramatically the way we have experienced through the ten cent increase in the beginning of the year, through the actions that might be taken through the department to get back some of the cash from the recent increases in the price of fuel, I would argue others that have fallen through the cracks may become users of income support.
There are a lot of people in smaller communities who are just barely meeting their needs with their jobs now because their fuel costs increased. They do not make more money when they are on income support. This puts more pressure on this government, especially where hunting and trapping are used for country food to help with their income. The cost of fuel is so important.
If we cannot, with the 17 projects that we have, all of which are in small, isolated communities that really depend on hunting and fishing...they really rely on the fuel. If we cannot take care of the subsidy of the pumps, then it just leaves more administration problems for this government to deal with down the road, which is going to cost more money to this government. I would strongly encourage the department to consider all these factors when and if they decide to raise the price of fuel in the communities.