Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I may be ruled out of order, but I am going to try this anyway. Because of the complexity of this particular bill or any other bills that might be complicated in the future, I would have liked to see the standing committee's remarks in advance so that I was aware of exactly what they are commenting on and other sections that they might have a concern with in the bill. I wonder if this is a House rule or proper procedure?
James Arvaluk on Committee Motion 67-12(3): To Adopt Recommendation No. 2
In the Legislative Assembly on December 10th, 1992. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 67-12(3): To Adopt Recommendation No. 2
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
December 10th, 1992
Page 439
James Arvaluk Aivilik
See context to find out what was said next.