Just on the one part. The statement here really is saying what you are saying. You know, in terms of the collective bargaining, there are many benefits that are accruing to government people, like vacation travel and all these extra benefits -- removal, after so many years a couple of trips out -- you know these are part of the collective agreement, and what this report has said is that
because it has been there so long, people who are not employed by government, who are outside working in other areas like maybe even a private garage -- somebody has got a garage -- they do not get this if they are a non-native person, and so there is a feeling that it should be upgraded for them to receive the same benefits.
As well, in terms of the status native people, which are the Inuit and the status Dene, they receive certain benefits that they do not have to pay for, where a Metis person has to pay. So the Metis people and other people who are not involved with government would like to be drawn up to it, because it is just a statement of the fact that when the higher standard is available, people want to move up to it. The thing is that some of them are already in the collective agreement. Other ones are paid for by a medical insurance plan, et cetera, so it is not a criticism but just stating a fact that these different levels of support exist and people tend to feel that everyone should have the same. That is really a statement, and I just want to agree with that.