I just wanted to make a general comment on the way historic buildings and museums have been handled. In the case of Baker Lake, we had an organization which was developing an historic area using the mission house. In the last couple of years, the government went ahead and put together a visitors' centre which is very similar to what is being built or renovated in Baker Lake. Somehow the two groups -- the government being one of the groups -- have not worked together, thereby making it more costly for the groups involved to build or renovate the buildings that are being put in place in Baker Lake. I think that when such buildings or renovations are being done, a policy has to also be looked at whereby the communities are consulted before any move is made as far as historical
buildings are concerned. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.