Mr. Chairman, the Member is correct. Technically, the plebiscite vote is on whether that particular boundary is acceptable or not to be used for the purpose of dividing the Territories. Technically, that is the, question. It has always been the common view that people, particularly in the West, will not vote or will vote massively against any boundary regardless of how viable it may be as long as they do not have some constitutional assurance of what they will be faced with. That has been consistently reflected over the last 10 years. If we are going to divide as Inuvialuit, as Dene/Metis, if we are going to be in the West, then we have to have some assurances before division takes place that there is a constitution -- a future government that
we will be comfortable with before division goes ahead. This has been one of the conditions. This is why I raised it. The Member is right. It is not really explicit, but the fact is that is what needed to be done before we felt people would take a vote. We felt it would be a useless exercise to set up a plebiscite vote if we did not do anything here in the West. That is what the Legislature had agreed to make moneys available for last year in preparation. There have been instances in the committee where at least one group asked for additional money. It has been rejected or vetoed by other Members because they felt it was not well thought out, and they did not feel it was proper to come forward at this time. I know that if there is a request by political leaders to ask this Legislature for additional money, as lead Minister for this, I would bring it to the House to be considered. How well I would be able to defend is another point. That is what I would do if I was so directed by that group. Thank you.