Thank you, Mr. Chairman. There was a series of questions in there. but I will try to clarify the committee's statement. The committee, during its hearings, heard numerous recommendations, but the committee also was very clear in where direction on this review should come from, and who should be responsible. Earlier in the report, it was made clear that this Assembly should be responsible, with the Minister as the designated person. The committee also was very clear that we did not want to work in isolation of what the board was doing or what the Minister was doing and that it should be a co-operative effort. Basically, we felt it should be the responsibility of the Legislative Assembly. One of the recommendations was that there be a tripartite panel of industry, business and someone else, an independent person, to deal with the review. We felt it should be done through the board with the Minister and with the various standing committees because we have roles to play in reviewing legislation.
We are also of the opinion that, since the Minister had stated the board would be able to cover costs of preparing the action paper, this was the understanding that these motions are based on. Thank you.