Maybe that philosophical difference in this House might exist, in terms of interpretation. I do not believe that all Cabinet Members are totally committed to the idea of aboriginal self-government in the context of what is in the constitution. Maybe that is where some of the philosophical differences exist.
I want to ask, in light of that remark, that it seems that the documents are not concluded. Why are Members, and maybe there is a misquote in the papers, being accused of not, in fact, supporting the initiatives, when the work has not been brought before us to review and, in fact, support the direction that the Minister might be wanting to take?