Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as I understand the honourable Member's question, she is asking about the first step that has been taken under the Medical Profession Act's Board of Inquiry process.
I believe she is asking about the service of notice within two weeks before the inquiry begins, which is really, as I understand it, the first step in the board of inquiry process itself.
Therefore, I would only wish to comment that I think your ruling on the appropriateness of this question, and the application of the sub-judice rule, will be an important precedent. The inquiry has begun with this process, and if questions are allowed about the first step of the process of the actual inquiry in this House, then you may be permitting, by precedent, questions to continue on a daily basis about the inquiry itself.
So I do not wish to argue, but I am sure all Members would agree that this House should not be seen to be a prejudice thing; an independent process that has been set up by an act of this Legislature. So I think it is an important question, and one which may not be urgent, but that it be answered today. Perhaps I might recommend, that it is something that could be considered, and I wish a ruling could be given on due reflection. Thank you.