Just in regards to the debate on the point of privilege, Mr. Speaker, I guess in looking at the whole basis for the sub-judice convention, is that what happens in this House, it should not jeopardize a person's right to a fair hearing before the courts, and I fully agree with that, and respect it.
I do not believe that there is any way the question that I posed today can be considered that. I would urge you to consider in your deliberation, that in no point in time did I indicate in the preamble of my question, that it was my intention to refer to the substance of any matter before the board.
My question was to refer to the procedures used, and the process used, whereas I was told last week posing this question, or two weeks ago, that this was an independent process, but documents given to me have told me otherwise. This is the type of context that I would also urge you to look at, as we raise this point in the House.