Mr. Chairman, the Member is correct. I am going on the understanding that the new territory, if it is created, will not be denied representation in the Senate or the House of Commons. That is the understanding that I have, and if the Constitution does not reflect that, at this time, then the question comes up, then is it necessary to, is it useful to support, or reject, the package as a result of this.
I would argue Nunavut is not quite in the bag yet, we still have a few hoops to jump through, including the ratification of the T.F.N. claim, and our own process up here, to come to that realization. In my view, we have to press really hard, but I do not think we should let it develop into something that could constitute a deal breaker for us. That if, for instance, in a worse case scenario, that somehow there is no assurance that a Nunavut territory will, if it is created, be represented in the House of Commons and in the Senate, then my advice would still be that we should endorse the package and nail down the significance we have made, and press on to make the other gains that we see as shortcomings at this time. Thank you.