Just, perhaps as a trivial point, but, in the event that these amendments go through as it is, without any assurance to the Nunavut territory, there is one hypothetical situation that might be of interest to the particular member. The Nunavut Territory, as it is prescribed now, would constitute a territory of Canada.
If the western territory should make use of the provision in the amendments that would allow for the creation of aboriginal governments, that may not necessarily be constituting a territory of Canada, under the present constitutional definitions. I am not certain that this part of the territory would be assured representation in the House of Commons or Senate, but surely the Nunavut Territory would meet that particular definition more comfortably.
I raise that just because I think it has been mentioned to me by one interested observer.