Mr. Speaker, the honourable Member indicated to me that the process would allow for the principle of justice, not only being done, but as being seen to be done. I am not challenging the honourable Member on making a decision about the rules, but the manner in which he chooses to hold an investigation.
What I am asking, is whether or not the honourable Member would reconsider the holding of the inquiry, if, in fact, justice is not being seen to be done. That was the original question that I asked. However the Honourable Member says no, that is in fact not happening.
The problem that I have is that there have been comments in the papers and in the media which the public have indicated they are not happy with, or the process as it has been established.
Surely that is a good basis by which one can consider re-establishing or reviewing this particular matter.