Mr. Speaker, as far as the general past replies, I believe there was an indication from some Members' replies that they had taken into consideration what the Government Leader had said. If it has to be more formal, I am not particularly stuck on one way of doing business. I don't have any objections that, in these replies, the mention of priorities or statements be incorporated into that. It has been done before. I just felt that the Members took that into account. At this stage, I would think if there was a feeling that there should be more in the Commissioner's address, we can change that, if that is the wish of the House. If the replies to the Commissioner's address incorporate some of the things I have said, I have no objection to that.
Nellie Cournoyea on Question 11-12(4): Commissioner's Address Vs Premier's Statement
In the Legislative Assembly on November 19th, 1993. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 11-12(4): Commissioner's Address Vs Premier's Statement
Question 11-12(4): Commissioner's Address Vs Premier's Statement
Item 6: Oral Questions
November 18th, 1993
Page 36
Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput
See context to find out what was said next.