Mr. Chairman, I guess I was answering only one part of the Member's inquiry -- how do you measure success and appreciation. Yes, I believe that when we entered into consolidation and some of decentralization, we knew that we couldn't do the decentralization unless we did some consolidation. That was supposed to work hand in hand. If we didn't streamline and consolidate, we wouldn't have the resources to redirect.
We did recognize at the front end that there would be costs, but in the long-term, it would balance out because of the ability for us to get our act in place here. I think one of the things that is questioned a lot is what is the role of the central agency, how does that work? I'm an advocate of a strong central agency. Some things have to exist here. But, I think if we can show the Northwest Territories what that role is and where they can take part, they will see it is long-term planning.
I know that sometimes it is felt that we plan in the period of a four year term. But, I think the outcome of consolidation and putting things where they should be will allow those cost savings to be transmitted to decentralization. If we didn't have a response on one end, then it would be difficult to have the support in terms of the central part of our planning.
I think I probably only answered one part of your question. I hope that clears it up. I do recognize that at the front end, there were going to be heavier costs to start decentralization, but because it was done in conjunction with consolidation then in the long-term it will balance out. Thank you.