Mr. Chairman, I am just wondering what the intent of the motion is here. I agree that there should be reconsideration by the department, but it focuses on four highways. It doesn't focus on highway 7 or highway 3. If we are looking at redistributing the monies with regard to the 1994-95 fiscal year, then should it only be for those four highways. Or are we saying, "The committee further
recommends that all highways listed below be considered in conjunction with the objective?"
We do have a transportation strategy document and we also have a new one coming up that has also been considered by Mr. Gordon Wray. He is doing another report on that. I don't know what the forecast is for the next two or three years, but I think if we are going to be supporting a motion like this we should be supporting all highways in conjunction with that.