Thank you. The committee, in deliberating and reviewing this issue, was also left with the same questions. The intent of the motion is to review this payment, assess the feasibility of recovering and, from whom. That is why we are asking for the review. The question is left unanswered. We know that Mr. DeLury, at the time, was on contract to the Executive Council through the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs, and that he did get approval to work for two days, but then the resulting bill was for 69 hours and some $8,000. The assessment that we are looking for is to determine what components were approved, what was not approved, and the resulting legal implications as to who the recovery should come from.
Fred Koe on Committee Motion 75-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 3, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on December 6th, 1993. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 75-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 3, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
December 6th, 1993
Page 468
Fred Koe Inuvik
See context to find out what was said next.