Thank you. I would like to receive that information sometime. The Minister has made a statement that in one particular community the people are not happy with the amounts they receive. Are we changing a committee structure so that we can meet the demand of making people happy? Why are they not happy? I believe it is because of the rules, regulations and amounts which are being issued and the limited dollars which are being allowed in many cases. The other issue is the local social workers and how they interpret rules. You have had questions today on the use of vouchers. Many communities do not give cash. During our visits of the Special Committee on Health and Social Services we found that people are concerned with these things because they affect their daily lives. I know this is another debate but I am just trying to make a point. This is a bigger issue than changing our abilities to deal with complaints.
The issue I wanted to get to with regard to the amount of work load, and I know this is not a money bill, however, many of these committee members get an honorarium, and in some cases where they do not, they wish they did. This is one of the complaints we heard from the communities. Some of them get paid, some of them do not get paid. Some of them get paid through the hamlet and some have their own administration, it varies across the territories. What impact would changing this particular bill have on the cost of administering the committees. Are there going to be additional costs incurred by the department if we pass this bill?