Maybe just to follow up a bit on Mr. Nerysoo's questions. Under the act, section 34 refers to any kind of disclosure with regard to client confidentiality. It doesn't refer to the actions you take. I don't know whether this is the legal opinion you got, but I see this as a situation where a complaint has been made and the section where the individual is involved is eliminated but the context of the complaint shouldn't be confidential.
You said that you couldn't discuss it because of confidentiality but do you see this as the interpretation? You don't expose an individual's name, but it certainly doesn't stop you from exposing the contents of the complaint, right? Am I correct?