Just a final question. The justification for continuing the secondment provided by the Minister in his correspondence and today is that the corporation could not afford to bear the costs of an administrator. I guess this is the person's position. Why is this the case after five years? Thank you.
Jim Antoine on Committee Motion 31-12(5): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 22nd, 1994. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 31-12(5): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 21st, 1994
Page 774
Jim Antoine Nahendeh
See context to find out what was said next.